Building Wealth from the Ground Up

Building Wealth from the Ground Up

Two paths lead to a healthier bottom line; this much is known in the business world. Making money or cutting costs are the two main options. There is no longer any way for a company to turn a profit by cutting corners.

However, it's also true that any company's profits can be eaten away by waste and unnecessary internal costs. Thus, in order to succeed in a cutthroat corporate world, you need to use both approaches.

When a company starts looking for ways to save money, the owners usually want to find big income leaks in their systems. This goal could be explicit or implicit. As a result, the company would essentially generate money from the ground up if those procedures were enhanced to eradicate that waste.

In order to begin such a cost-cutting initiative, a company would often look for "the low hanging fruit" initially. What we mean is that middle management will look for superficial ways to save money in the hopes of appeasing upper management. For this reason, it is common practice to start by eliminating unnecessary break room amenities or replacing throwaway cups with mugs.

While these locations may provide some short-term savings, the real opportunities to improve a company's operations lie elsewhere and necessitate a more thorough investigation into existing processes to uncover inefficiencies.

"Process improvement" is a common term for the approach used to identify these "money pits" in an organization. Process improvement is a way of looking at a business process from start to finish and drawing a diagram of it. This diagram should include the steps that the process takes, who is responsible for what, and where in the process inefficient methods are leading to high costs.

The typical places where a company's structure is considered to be ripe for a process improvement audit include...

duplication of effort among different divisions. A company's departments are known to act like fiefdoms and become hostile toward, if not outright hostile toward, other departments. As a result, managers in charge of different departments will impose red tape and needless procedures in order to transfer "work" to their own or keep finished tasks moving forward. This kind of excessive expense can be expensive for individual departments and slow down the company overall to the point where it reduces profitability.

issues with conveying ideas. The various departments and entities that make up an organization contribute to the overall value of a business process as it progresses from start to finish. However, processes might come to a standstill and wait for hours, if not days, to finish before the missing communication is found and the task is added to the cycle.

This happens when interactions between departments or individuals along the process chain are incorrect. A significant burden on the firm can result from this communication slowdown or breakdown.

To fix the issue, we need to reevaluate our current methods of communication to make sure that everyone who matters at each link in the chain is kept informed about what needs doing and can let the next agent know when their part of the process is finished.

An inadequate system for handling information technology. Wasted effort is caused by antiquated computer applications that do not communicate with each other, which necessitates repetitive data entry at each stage of the process. Significant improvements in efficiency will result from data and system standardization and integration.

There is a lot of inefficiency and waste in the current method of taking a business requirement from its beginning to its end; we can fix this by making it more streamlined. Upon completion of a process, we can swiftly transfer it to the next department by implementing modern integration designs at the IT and process levels. The end result is a more efficient business that is "making money from the inside out" rather than "bleeding money" as a result of inefficiencies. 

Share :